Roger Williamson Artist Statement
Artist Statement
This artist statement provides a brief analysis of Williamson’s artistic philosophy.
1. The “Cloud-Gazing” Mode of Perception
Williamson’s rejection of “rigid academic or societal filters” is not anti-intellectualism, but a strategic recalibration of attention. He advocates for what psychologists might call “bottom-up processing“—where sensory input is interpreted freely, without immediate top-down imposition of learned categories (e.g., “this is a postmodern critique,” “this symbolises the crucifixion”).
-
Child as Model: A child seeing a dragon in a cloud is engaging in pure symbolic thinking—connecting perception directly to imagination, unmediated by convention. Williamson wants the viewer to approach his art with this same interpretive courage. The artwork becomes a “cloud” of formed intention, but its final “shape” is determined in the viewer’s mind.
-
The “Filter” as Barrier: He suggests that over-reliance on art history, theory, or market trends can create a layer of insulation between the viewer and the visceral, emotional, and subconscious resonance of the work. His art invites you to feel and imagine first, and analyse later, if at all.
2. The Artist as “Oyster”: Art as Exorcism and Pearl-Making
This metaphor is rich with implications:
-
The Irritant: The “inner conflict” or “unresolved” material is essential. It could be a personal trauma, an existential question, a social tension, or a spiritual yearning. Art is not born from contentment but from a need to grapple with something.
-
The Process (Exorcism): The act of creating is a ritual of extraction and objectification. By giving form to the formless anxiety, the artist distances themselves from it, examines it, and—to some degree—master’s it. It moves from a haunting, internal pressure to a tangible, external thing that can be seen and shared. This is the “exorcism.”
-
The Product (The Pearl): Crucially, the process doesn’t just expel the irritant; it transforms it. The pearl is beautiful, valuable, and enduring. The artwork is not a mere symptom of conflict; it is its alchemical result—something new, separate, and capable of generating meaning for others. The pain becomes a pearl, the conflict becomes a symbol open to connection.
3. The Living Dialogue: From Static Object to Dynamic Field
This is where Williamson’s philosophy becomes truly interactive. The artwork is not a vessel containing a fixed message.
-
The Completion Circuit: The artist creates a potential space (the artwork). The viewer enters that space with their own history, emotions, and cognitive patterns. Their perception fuses with the artist’s intention, but the resulting experience is a third thing, unique to that moment and person. The artwork is “completed” anew with each viewer.
-
The Viewer’s Authority: This philosophy radically empowers the viewer. There is no “wrong” interpretation. If a symbol in Williamson’s work reminds you of a childhood memory, a dream, or a current fear, that connection is valid and integral to the work’s purpose. You are not decoding his reality; you are activating your own using his symbols as a catalyst.
4. “Create Your Own Reality”: The Foundational Imperative
This statement is the bedrock. It positions art not as decoration or commentary, but as a fundamental survival skill.
-
Condemnation to Another’s Reality: This refers to living by unchallenged assumptions—cultural norms, political ideologies, commercial desires, or other people’s expectations. It’s a passive existence where your inner world is colonized by external forces.
-
The Arena of Personal Creation: Williamson’s artwork is a safe training ground for this skill. In the encounter with his symbolic “pearl,” you practice:
-
Projection: Imposing your own inner world onto an external form.
-
Meaning-Making: Drawing connections that are significant to you.
-
Symbolic Literacy: Developing your personal vocabulary of images and feelings.
-
-
Mirror to Nature’s Motion: This ties it all together. Nature is not static; it’s a process of constant growth, decay, and transformation. Similarly, Williamson’s art rejects fixed meaning. It is designed to be fluid, to change with the light, the context, and, most importantly, the consciousness of the observer. Its reality is perpetually in motion, just like the natural world and the human mind.
In essence, Roger Williamson is less an artist in the traditional sense of a master craftsperson presenting a finished truth, and more a “reality-game master” or an “experience architect.” He provides the evocative, symbolic components and a philosophical rule-set: Engage openly, transform your inner conflicts into something tangible, and use this space to practice the most vital art of all—the conscious creation of your own lived reality.